Saturday, September 24, 2011

Maximizing the Free Software Experiential Training and Development

It is not uncommon for customers and business manager for the novelty of the adventure education, outdoor training and development programs to be swept. This often leads to misuse, expectations, and even worse to training that is left in the classroom. The problem, says Nancy Gansneder - University of Virginia professor and board member of the National Society for Experiential Education (Vity) - is that "people who want to have a much shorter duration, one day romp in the park tendthat affect how a team goes to work together. That did not happen. We have to invest a lot of time in it, and the payoff is down the road. "(Schetter, 2002). Research Priest and Lesperance out and support this finding suggests that each team can go through OTD program loss improved after six months without any support in the form of follow-up procedures, including group meetings, social events, coaching sub-teams, training courses and self-restraint(1994).

How many sellers will tell you, the education of customers is the first step in helping to provide training that includes an external component. Using outdoor adventure training needs, education is actually a cuonsumer informed, practicing good instructional design and know how to choose an appropriate provider.

Team Building Training

As an informed customer

Many common abuse of outdoor training and development are of incorrect information provided by suppliers and the lack of aeducated customer base. Area information benefits, theory and methodology surrounding glossy color photographs of Roman shade that is often the best project avoided a portrait of the nature and benefits of vehicles of learning.

What is the Outdoor Adventure Training and Development

Outdoor Adventure Training and development can be used as the selective use of pool-based active learning can be defined to improve organizational changes through the following measuresPersonal Learning (current terminology and methodology). These programs are among a variety of different categories depending on the location of the program found.

Common name for outdoor training and development

United States

Based on the experience of training and development (eBTD), (Miner, 1991) Adventure Outdoor Training (Laabs, 1991; Tarullo, 1992, Barker, 1995; White, 1995) Outdoor Based Experiential Training (Wagner and Campbell, 1994) External development(Burnett and James, 1994) Outdoor Management Development (Holden, 1994; Ibbetson and Newell, 1999) Adventure Education, (Miles and Priest, 1993) Adventure-Based Learning (Callard and Thompson, 1992) Executive Challenge (Tarullo, 1992) Outdoor Training Challenge, (Baldwin, Wagner, and Rolland, 1991) Adventure Education, Adventure Challenge, Corporate Challenge Program (Web References)
New Zealand, United Kingdom

Outdoor Management Development (OMD) (Ibbetson and Newell,1999)
Australia and Canada

Adventure business training (CAT), (Priest and Lesperance, 1994)

In the wake of Gass, Goldman and Priest eBTD model (closely related OTD), and as directed by the project's website Challenge (http://www.projectchallenge.com/training.htm, 2004), OTD (eBTD) six components that distinguish them from traditional learning.

OTD is experiential education: while working with his hands on conditions are best learned by doing. OTD is dramatic: the emotionand emotional aspect of these activities, attention and sharpens the mind. People remember what they learn. OTD's new: Due to the unique and the uncertainty of the results of these activities, no one is going to be an expert. Adventures tend to compensate people and break down hierarchical barriers and fears, which are often in large organizations. OTD is the result: Error potential impact on adventures (always wet in a canoe or fall of a rope), unlike aClassroom simulation (where the money game is lost). Moreover, the success and failure of those who really matter (employees and themselves) support. OTD is metaphorically adventures are a microcosm of the requirements and the changing world of work necessary. Behavior of individuals and groups can be detected during these activities in parallel representations of the way they act and what happens in the office. As such, new learning (skills, coping strategies and a link betweenStaff) can be used similarly for future efforts in the labor market. OTD is transferable: testimonies from past participants help demonstrate the utility of experience-based training, and limited studies that show no new learning in the workplace. People refer to their experience and approach their tasks from a new perspective.

Although OTD is based on these concepts, approaches and vehicles can be implemented very differently. While most of the OTDExternal programs (was to create a new trend in artificial indoor outdoor) are carried out varies the level of education, type of activity, level of risk and the results obtained, depending on the type of syllabus. Richard Wagner and Christopher Roland, author of "How effective is outdoor training?" to suggest that programs SDDs are divided into two categories:

Programs typically use low-impact initiatives with limited physical risk. Activities tendan entire work group to participate. Programs use high-impact initiatives that have a relatively high risk perceived. They may be at the center of activity.

This model seems incomplete, given the heterogeneous nature of the OTD vehicles and their attention to groups or individuals affected. Although proposing Agrana, Garvey, Miner priests a detailed model of the activities and goals, their model seems incomplete. Used a comprehensive model linkingthe two is given below.

The activities and aims of the OTD

Games socialization

Examples: Name of the game, group juggling, human knot, sitting on the lap, Circle Circle, Circle Yurt Description: Games and activities with the aim of working groups and individuals familiar with the other members of the group, inciting the excitement of the group founders conceived tones, and the reduction of individual inhibitions. Results: Fun, getting acquainted, socializing, fun
GroupInitiatives

Examples: Prouty's Landing, Croc Pit, Spider Web, the Wall Group Descriptions: problems with real and imaginary obstacles on the ground (natural and built), the challenge to join a group of their resources and work together to find solutions. Successful solutions require the involvement of all members of the working group in concert (Brassfield, Sandweiss and Smith, 2004). Results: The strategies of teamwork, strategic planning, effective communication, decision making,Leadership, personality types, conflict resolution, resource allocation, creative problem solving, trust and support.
Low Ropes Courses

Examples: Mohawk Walk, dazed wild Dangle Dou Descriptions: often consist of individual elements or a set of elements a few feet above the ground. Much like high ropes course elements, these activities do not depend on physical or mechanical fastening systems, but spotting aggressive participants. Generally require a certain physique,supported by other members of the group and the willingness to take risks. With a higher degree of danger present. Results: Individual and group performance, strategies, teamwork, personal growth, risk taking, trust, communication
High Ropes Courses

Examples: Pamper Pole, Mulit-Vine Traverse, Burma Bridge, Postman walk Description: Here, an arbitrary number of elements above the ground, where a state court, a system of some kind are used, is to manage the risk. Courses of study available to the physicalStrength, endurance, agility, balance and flexibility, and invite participants to emotional problems such as fear of heights to fail, and the fear of facing the fear of losing control. It is necessary for participants to draw reserves of courage and strength and to examine assumptions about their physical and emotional limits. Conducted in the context of group encouragement and support, these programs often lead the participants an awareness of themselves and to an increaseConfidence and self-esteem (Brassfield et al., 2004). Results: Risk-taking, fears Facing re-evaluate assumptions about the physical and emotional limits, generate tension, build confidence, support and encouragement Foster.
Activity-Based Outdoor Activities

Examples: rock climbing, canoeing, caving, rafting, mountain biking Description: See outdoor adventure, where climbing, kayaking, rafting or any other vehicle used for fighting are metaphoricallyProblems. The level of activity, effects and risks to the environment, leadership skills, the nature of the program, and the vehicle used to depend. Results: The trust, deal with change and uncertainty, leadership, conflict resolution and decision.
Wilderness-Based Outdoor Activities

Examples: expedition-style backpacking, canoeing, rafting and Description: See the adventures extended or more days in the wild, where food and supplies are carried out in collaboration with the group. Results:Evaluation of leadership development, decision-making, conflict resolution, group process, Big Picture, teamwork, bonding
More adventures

Examples: military scenarios, fire walking, bungee jumping, car racing Description: Can be a series of simulated or non-traditional activities to new target, refer to common experiences. Different vehicles for different metaphors. Results: The simulations allow a large screen experience, time management and decision-making, while non-traditionalActivities focus on motivation, commitment and leadership teams.
Myths outdoor training and development

Outdoor Training and Development has developed over the last thirty years and is now on the right track with the current theories of instructional design and training. Critics and skeptics often speak of programs and the reference OTD yesterday. While there are some programs that have fallen behind the times, many of the practices of ancient myths and outdated programs OTDand no longer apply.

Myth 1: OTD is inherently dangerous places and people in difficult situations.
Fact 1: Some elements of the SDDs are risky by nature than others. However, research has repeatedly shown that the adventures are much safer than most other traditional physical activities "(Priest & Gass, 1997), further investigations show that the key factors in the level of risk activities regarding OTD : 1 hour) participants. Screening 2) the quality andAbility to guide or teacher. The Adventure of the Project shows 20-year study of deaths and injuries on the field challenge in 1995, published that reported a total of 194.8 million hours participant, the entire incident and injury rates from accidents to 4.33 accidents per million hours mean participant (Jillings, Furlong, LaRhette, Ryan, 1995). Which is significantly less than driving a car to and from the site. Although the information critical incident is a challenge to discover the adventureIndustry, Keith Jacobs experiential Systems and a member of Challenge Course Technology has recently announced that he was aware of 16 critical events between 2002 and 2004. Of the 16 incidents experienced two deaths. Almost all the events attributed to some or all responsibility for the error phrase trainers (2004).

Myth 2: OTD participant pushes too much and makes people into potentially dangerous positions.
Fact 2: The outdoor training and developmentThe industry has almost universally the concept of "Challenge by choice" has been adopted. Experts know that certain exercises OTD encourage participants to take place far beyond their borders, and participants will try their best, and only things that are comfortable. Boot Camp and trust cases in the head at the beginning of a program are (almost) a thing of the past.

Myth 3: OTD is too expensive.
Step 3: OTD program quality, depending on what you are looking for can varyfrom $ 50 to $ 1000 or more per person per day. Cost of the course are often quite in line with the education and training of others, which look similar. As with all training, the money is spent is an investment for the development of human potential. The expenses for the cost of the program, is often directly proportional to the return.

Making training work

Is there a name for the external training programs and development that poor instructional design flaw - we call it "recreational". AsRoger digs, Principal Consultant at Ellis Hayward, puts it, "one of the greatest risks an organization invests in Outdoor Management Development (OMD) [United Kingdom and New Zealand term for OTD] leaves the classroom training" (Gregory 1999). Learning should be considered to maximize OTD programs in the same light as more formal training. The implementation of a framework of design, like the ADIE (assessment, planning, implementation and evaluation) can be veryan advantage.

To assess. Peter Sheath, CEO of Bristol-conditioning of General Domestic Appliances and strong advocate for OTD advises: "First, you need to have clear expectations and ensure they are relevant" (Cook, 2000). If you compete in an analysis of basic needs, and "if it will benefit all companies, it is not," warns Karen Moore, a psychologist and director of assessment Nest Group, a consultancy management training on the shores of Lake Windmere inCumbria.

Organizations must be absolutely free of its objectives and what they want to achieve. John Howard, a provider of SDDs Anglesey Sea and Surf Centre (ASSC) has discussed the potential customers. "They have completely superior in both objectives can not be fulfilled in a short course, or simply do not know exactly what they want." (Shutt, 1999). Vague or fuzzy goals often do not meet expectations and result in failed courses. Be sure to showcase your destinationYour trainer and supplier in the design of the program. Fuzzy goals are clarified.

Design. Once an objective assessment has been completed, it is equally essential that a target audience and the evaluation was completed. Some activities and programs work well for some people. High ropes course, rafting and wilderness programs are not for everyone, and can be dangerous for older people with heart disease. Other activities include group initiatives areuniversal and to allow students more options and features to choose their own experience and level of involvement.
For the choice of activities and design of the program, be sure to consider pre-teaching and follow-up activities and programs. A good supplier can help you choose a way that best meets their programmatic needs.

More will be said about choosing a vendor later in this document.

Implementation. The programs vary greatly in extent and the nature of the productSelected provider. Groups that are well prepared, are more likely to reap the fruits of OTD. In many cases, this means that participants are informed of what is expected of them and what they expect from the program. Participants often express symptoms of anxiety and distress when they decide the right information, otherwise they feel is missing.

Is chosen depending on the length and type of program, should the active components, and time for reflection and discussion, in almost equal parts.Participants at the time to make adjustments and apply new knowledge must be immediately assigned, otherwise storing and sharing of information is unlikely. The choice of a good supplier is the key to the overall result of the program. Wagner suggests there is no greater indicator of the success of a program that the quality and the ability of the presenter (Cain and Jolliffe, 1998).

Assess. There is a real lack of good assessment which was conducted in the field of outdoor education andDevelopment. How is the bottom line for most companies, HR departments feel the pressure, to show support for their programs. OTD programs are often high on the list because of their innovative nature and extravagant. Steve Nielsen, Director General of the leadership, is quick to inform experts and business managers. "If you just look at the bottom line, you're just going on things that can really be measured And if that work is all that, Go to work, then you are doomed to failure. You need people with a lot where people live - in his heart -. And then tie on their heads "

Choosing a provider

Availability of outdoor education programs in the United States is staggering. Jim Liggett, owner and founder of the Incorporated Association Courses Ropes Challenge Course Technology, recently, there were more than 15,000 high ropes course in the United States estimated. These statistics should be taken with a grainSalt, but there are many programs and courses as part of a summer camp run. Kirk Hallowell, co-chairman of Experience Based Training and Development (eBTD), suggests that there is a difference between software programs, educational programs and organizations to provide organizational development offered. "An organization like the YMCA or the field, can have a high ropes course, but are not necessarily able to offer a corporate program" (Campbell 1996).

When approaching aProvider, you must be prepared. Shop around and compare programs from a variety of suppliers, both locally and elsewhere is a good feeling for this is what is possible and works better for you to get.

Priest offers a characterization of the company and / or programs eBTD which can be very useful when comparing providers, and to decide whether a program OTD is right for your organization (c).

Types of programs and associated costs

Recreation Education program typeDevelopment redirection
The main purpose feelings change to change a functional behavioral change resistance and refusal to rethink
Universal application / any level of organization intact group (team) pairs or individuals
Action events off-the-shelf custom tailorUnique and original
Date Action Reflection Learning Cycle fire Supported Learning Transfer Transfer
Organizational objectives and their well-integrated continuous connection Aware Disconnected
Role of human resources may be missing in May to observe is to support the relief must facilitate cooperation
Intent to zero organizationalThe first change order to change change change of second order third order
No single organizational impact of individual system (unique) system + individual
Typical length of 0.5 to 2 days 1 to 3 days 2 to 5 days, 3 - 10 Days
Cost per client $ 50 + / $ 100 + Day Program / Day $ 200 + program / daily schedule$ 500 + / day program

The following 10 recommendations to grow the research of Richard Wagner and Christopher Rolland (1992) and completed a personal experience as a supplier OTD.

Define your goals for the program before the vehicle or the scope of the program. The program's objectives should be specific and measurable. If the goals are immeasurable, you should check with the supplier of clear objectives, that are willing to negotiate. Select a program OTDOn the basis of objective rather than recreational needs of the participants, their desires, or cost restrictions. Simply adopting a program often means sacrificing some of the lower targets. If a program is not suitable for your goals, think about your goals and consider a new program. Remember, you should use the program with the objectives and not vice versa, are dictated. Look for a provider that listens to your needs and desires. Suppliers of quality will be willing to adapt the trainingProgram to meet your specific needs. Look for the cookie-cutter models. What worked for someone else is not necessarily for your company. Choose a company that meets your needs complete planning. Some operators offer needs analysis and assessment services, others do not. In many cases it is more convenient for those trainers who conduct your business on needs assessment and use. In this case, it is also useful if the trainer to comeand facilitate discussion. The more the supplier is required, the more careful you need to check references and choose carefully. Ask for references and check on them. Do not rely on word of mouth of a glossy magazine ads. Enter a proven track record of safety and efficiency of programs. Suppliers of quality should be able to give you some kind of documentation. Find out how much time is spent engaged in his work and how longspent in discussion and reflection. As part of the thumb, must be at least 20 minutes of every hour spent will be reflected. This could be done in various ways. Discover the alternative forms of transmission rear support for the workforce. Discover the qualifications of the mediator. Moderators are trained in first aid? They have particular expertise in dealing with other clients in your workspace? What evidence should wear them? If the nature of your business is specific and can notFind a seller to consider, an expert in your company or elsewhere, to help make connections to new employees in the workplace. Costs. Programs can range from $ 100 to $ 1000 or more per person per day. Do not let the cost driving factor in your decision. Additional costs for providers of quality should be considered as investments for the development of employees and not be charged. If the cost does not allow you to choose a reliable supplier should provide an alternative educationVehicle. Download the senior management and key decision-makers together. Evaluate the effectiveness of the OTD. Maximize your results using the program based on the results of the evaluation. Outdoor Training and development can be a powerful tool to use if correct, but it is important to know your limits. Although the data to complete, suggesting that the OTD programs have measurable performance at work, there is a need for more formal investigations by both suppliers andCompanies that are implementing the programs. Currently, the largest defense and security is to ensure the quality of an educated client program, that the principles of good instructional design have been established and the selection of a supplier of quality that is in collaboration with your organization (Priest, C ) is concerned. Another criticism could be proved right in their assertion that OTD is simply too expensive and burned for days in the park manager.

Maximizing the Free Software Experiential Training and Development

No comments:

Post a Comment