Friday, July 15, 2011

Assess team performance and determine training needs

Many organizations, as you say fight if their teams are effective. Others who are just starting out, working groups or teams had long asked what kind of new training or follow-up, should give the teams to ensure their effectiveness. Both needs can be met through the development of a method for evaluating the team.

Each team should separately in the assessment and would be better if the participation of individual members is anonymous, so that membersdo not feel under pressure, everything is going to rank well. Anonymity is the honesty of the trial. Attending a process not without honesty also bring valuable information about the desired results.

Team Building Training

The easiest and fastest way to individual evaluation is a form-based survey. A standard form is an opportunity for continuous monitoring of the team must be on a quarterly basis. An evaluation of a good standard, it is also easier to compare teams, as all teams will be measured inSimilarly, for training. A good board evaluation team will determine questions regarding the roles of group meetings and group performance charts with numbered to identify training needs. An example could be ranking for the team always does this, often to make 2, 3 for times, 4 to make from time to time, and 5 not to. The growth of each team, the evaluation may also make room for specific questions about the types of teams, such as questions completion of the project team or work settingsand behavior.

Questions about the team and assigning the rows will help determine whether additional training is required. If the example above series are used, where the team a question with a very large number of rows, this suggests the need for training in this area immediately. If the rankings are very low numbers, then additional training may be required or can not wait until the team decides it's necessary. For a mid-ranking, the team needs some training, but the question is notAs a direct result unless the ranking changes.

What kind of training is necessary, based on rankings of evaluation? If the series were assigned to roles that can offer training on soft skills such as leadership, methods to encourage participation, conflict resolution, time management, team-phases and roles, communication, giving and receiving are performance feedback., interpersonal skills, personality differences, diversity and education on empowerment and responsibility with authority.Technical skills that can be used for some members of certain roles are necessary, consist of minutes or written reports, software, organization and quality statistics. For meetings, the highest ranking should give the team needs training in managing effective meetings, decision-making or techniques to generate ideas and solve problems.

Questions about the group's performance may indicate the need for a facilitated process to develop or support group purposesMission and objectives. Or training in time management, planning / management and possibly detailed instructions on procedures, process flow analysis or policy may be required. If the team category, the questions were added, the values ​​obtained for these questions to determine the specific training required. For example, a project team needs information technology project management training or education may apply to members of a particular computer language orApplication. While a team to solve a problem of agents of change or change management team, customer service needs, domain analysis, or problem solving techniques.

After the training was taken by team members and the past few months. Revaluation of the team to determine if the training is used effectively, or if you need to be updated. Keeping rated team performance and the members are trained in the key to effectiveness and success of teams in aOrganization.

NOTE: A free evaluation board of the group for the use of teams http://www.shirleyfinelee.com/FreeForms.htm is available for download.

Assess team performance and determine training needs

No comments:

Post a Comment